<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Triumph Thunderbird</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triumphthunderbird.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triumphthunderbird.org</link>
	<description>Past and Present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:25:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Triumph Thunderbird Motorcycles by Lifted trucks</title>
		<link>http://www.triumphthunderbird.org/triumph-thunderbird/triumph-thunderbird-motorcycles/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Lifted trucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triumphthunderbird.org/triumph-thunderbird/triumph-thunderbird-motorcycles#comment-7</guid>
		<description>The Thunderbird motorcycle went away after 1966 only to reappear in 1981 as the Thunderbird TR65. It had many upgraded components - wheels, brakes, suspension, etc. - and put 82hp to the ground - a significant increase. The design was slightly modified as well, but it retained its lovely retro styling. The 900 Sport was the last 885c.c. Thunderbird motorcycle to be made ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thunderbird motorcycle went away after 1966 only to reappear in 1981 as the Thunderbird TR65. It had many upgraded components &#8211; wheels, brakes, suspension, etc. &#8211; and put 82hp to the ground &#8211; a significant increase. The design was slightly modified as well, but it retained its lovely retro styling. The 900 Sport was the last 885c.c. Thunderbird motorcycle to be made ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Triumph Thunderbird Motorcycles by Franky</title>
		<link>http://www.triumphthunderbird.org/triumph-thunderbird/triumph-thunderbird-motorcycles/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triumphthunderbird.org/triumph-thunderbird/triumph-thunderbird-motorcycles#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I have a Triumph Thunderbird 900 year2003 and i am very happy rider.

For my country it&#039;s not big because i live in m Malta but i enjoy my rid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Triumph Thunderbird 900 year2003 and i am very happy rider.</p>
<p>For my country it&#8217;s not big because i live in m Malta but i enjoy my rid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Triumph Thunderbird Motorcycles by Steven Wilkerson</title>
		<link>http://www.triumphthunderbird.org/triumph-thunderbird/triumph-thunderbird-motorcycles/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Wilkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triumphthunderbird.org/triumph-thunderbird/triumph-thunderbird-motorcycles#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Bought my first Triumph in 1967 (Trophy TR6R) 3 more before 1981 (1 TR6R and two Bonnevilles).  Bought a 2000 Thunderbird Legend in 2004, and now I have my 2010 Triumph Thunderbird parked in my garage (next to my Legend).  What can I say, torque, torque and more torque.  Not like the Rocket III (which I have ridden while working at a&quot;triumph dealership), but plenty just the same.  Power is instant and delivered very smoothly through the belt drive.  I&#039;m 5&#039;7&quot; and the bike fits perfectly.  Much better than my 1991 Electraglide (no Triumphs to buy then).  The Rocket is just too big and wide.  The Thunderbird is comfortable and it handles like a Triumph.  Plenty of ground clearance for me and 90 mph comes up so fast it takes my breath away.  I didn&#039;t buy it for gas mileage, but I can&#039;t complain getting 50 mpg.  Every Triumph that I ever owned got me 50 mpg so I am one happy rider.  Can&#039;t wait to ride to Daytona in March.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought my first Triumph in 1967 (Trophy TR6R) 3 more before 1981 (1 TR6R and two Bonnevilles).  Bought a 2000 Thunderbird Legend in 2004, and now I have my 2010 Triumph Thunderbird parked in my garage (next to my Legend).  What can I say, torque, torque and more torque.  Not like the Rocket III (which I have ridden while working at a&#8221;triumph dealership), but plenty just the same.  Power is instant and delivered very smoothly through the belt drive.  I&#8217;m 5&#8242;7&#8243; and the bike fits perfectly.  Much better than my 1991 Electraglide (no Triumphs to buy then).  The Rocket is just too big and wide.  The Thunderbird is comfortable and it handles like a Triumph.  Plenty of ground clearance for me and 90 mph comes up so fast it takes my breath away.  I didn&#8217;t buy it for gas mileage, but I can&#8217;t complain getting 50 mpg.  Every Triumph that I ever owned got me 50 mpg so I am one happy rider.  Can&#8217;t wait to ride to Daytona in March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
